“Censors have a fantasy that if they get rid of all the Berensons and Mercolas and Malones, and rein in people like Joe Rogan, that all the holdouts will suddenly rush to get vaccinated. The opposite is true. If you wipe out critics, people will immediately default to higher levels of suspicion. They will now be sure there’s something wrong with the vaccine. If you want to convince audiences, you have to allow everyone to talk, even the ones you disagree with. You have to make a better case. The Substack people, thank God, still get this, but the censor’s disease of thinking there are shortcuts to trust is spreading.”
Matt Taibbi, “The Folly of Pandemic Censorship”
Taibbi is aboslutely right. I’m not a fan of Joe Rogan, or anti-vaccine people, or Covid deniers. I think they are wrong and dangerous in their wrongness. I also think censoring them is wrong, and counterproductive. You don’t sway those who have (real, legitimate) concerns by telling them they can’t listen to certain voices, that we need to censor those who seem to make sense to them. Free speech means we believe in the power of truth over lies, and we don’t fear the conflict between the two.